Masks are basically useless:

Study by the New England Journal of Medicine:

We know that wearing a mask outside health care facilities offers little, if any, protection from infection." https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp2006372

According to this study, masks could even be harmful:

This study is the first RCT of cloth masks, and the results caution against the use of cloth masks. This is an important finding to inform occupational health and safety. Moisture retention, reuse of cloth masks and poor filtration may result in increased risk of infection. http://adam.curry.com/enc/1589745004.365_clothmasksdontstopspreadoftransmission.pdf

That's what common sense says, and it's what countless medics have been saying for months, while being labelled as "insane" or "bullshitters". Because masks are common pieces of cloth, they do not filter the virus out.

---

Given that masks offer little to no protection from catching the virus, there's only more argument remaining. The one according to which the mask "prevents you from spreading the virus". Let's see:

The argument that asymptomatic people spread thr virus is incredibly weak.

• This research published on Pubmed, picked one asymptomatic carrier and put him in contact with 455 people. The 455 contacts ate with each other, on the same table, without masks, for almost a week. None of them caught the virus.

Conclusion:

We conclude that the infectivity of [at least] some asymptomatic is weak". https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32513410/

• The WHO in one of its countless backtracks, seem to confirm that: >Infection by asymptomatic carriers is rare. https://edition.cnn.com/2020/06/08/health/coronavirus-asymptomatic-spread-who-bn/index.html

Remember when the "holy scientific community", said that "asymptomatics spread the virus the most!"?

I remind you that the speculation about asymptomatic, was the main reason for the introduction of total lockdown.

That speculation, which recieved harsh treatment from the medical personnel, which made no sense (flu viruses, as the coronaviruses, spread true sneezes and coughs) and which was presented with no proofs, has now been dismissed.

But there's more, really.

• We know that acutal number of cases is 10-100 times bigger than the documented number. That means, that in case of the USA, you would have hundreds of millions of cases. The same as any seasonal flu. In case you need me to connect the dots, it means that the death-rate and serious-cases-rate is infinitesimal. Demonstrated by common sense, and by numbers.

If you look up the numbers on worldometers.org/coronavirus , you have "+50K" new cases, and +600 new deaths"*, and this is with mega crowdings, mega riots, beaches open etc.

Whereas during lockdown, you had +3K deaths per day.

It doesn't end here.

• Another fact, is that all the countries who did not enforce a heavy lockdown, and did not impose a mandatory masking, have a much better situation, healthcare-wise and economic-wise, than the countries who did. Switzerland, Sweden, Japan, Denmark, just to name a few,...did not have a healthcare emergency, and have had a minimal economical damage, compared to Italy, Spain, UK, and USA, until Trump miraculously revived it.

That directly shows that masks are not "vital," and their effect, is at the very best, marginal.

---

Given all that, having demonstrated that masks are basically useless, or pointless, we have to ask ourselves why the mainstream media is pushing so hard on the use of masks.

If they are useless, health-wise, why are they mandatory?

The reason, which is in perfect alignment with the globalist agenda/ideology, is that masks symbolize silencement and isolation. They symbolize the passage from humans to animals. What differentiates humans from animals is a distinctive face and logos (talk). Masks remove both.

This is confirmed by this document written by the Rockefeller family, in 2010.

"Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development"

This document is the description of their "ideal world", a globalist one (a world where all humanity is brought under 1 culture, 1 economy, 1 politics...), and they explain ways on how to reach it.

Do you know what is the way they found to reach this globalist world? A pandemic.

They wrote this, in 2010:

During the pandemic, national leaders around the world flexed their authority and imposed airtight rules and restrictions, from the mandatory wearing of face masks to body-temperature checks at the entries to communal spaces like train stations and supermarkets.

Even after the pandemic faded, this more authoritarian control and oversight of citizens and their activities stuck and even intensified. In order to protect themselves from the spread of increasingly global problems—from pandemics and transnational terrorism to environmental crises and rising poverty—leaders around the world took a firmer grip on power.*

At first, the notion of a more controlled world gained wide acceptance and approval. Citizens willingly gave up some of their sovereignty—and their privacy—to more paternalistic states in exchange for greater safety and stability.

There's worse:

In developed countries, this heightened oversight took many forms: biometric IDs for all citizens, for example, and tighter regulation of key industries.

And, in a perfect globalist key, you have to weaken sovereign-states, and empower international organisation:

Nation-states lost some of their power and importance as global architecture strengthened and regional governance structures emerged. International oversight entities like the UN took on new levels of authority, as did regional systems like the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), the New Partnership for Africa’s Development (NEPAD), and the Asian Development Bank (ADB).

That's what the pandemic will be used for, according to the Rockerfeller family.

So that's why I see the universal of masking, as a piece of this globalist and dictatorial puzzle.