all 229 comments

[–]LarrySwinger2 57 insightful - 2 fun57 insightful - 1 fun58 insightful - 2 fun -  (43 children)

If you agree that there is a disease, it's misleading to call the entire thing a hoax. "Exaggerated" or "a psy-op" are better descriptions.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 34 insightful - 3 fun34 insightful - 2 fun35 insightful - 3 fun -  (34 children)

The idea that it's a pandemic superbug is the hoax.

The hoaxes are the media productions, and hospital stagings, masks, etc.

Hoaxes abound.

[–]Aureus 15 insightful - 4 fun15 insightful - 3 fun16 insightful - 4 fun -  (30 children)

I agree that the media is hyping it up, and the lockdowns are terrible for the economy. But there is literally no cost in social distancing or wearing a mask.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 16 insightful - 4 fun16 insightful - 3 fun17 insightful - 4 fun -  (13 children)

The cost is sacrifice of freedom.

Also, many are terrified because they think it's a highly lethal superbug.

It's a PsyOp to have the public demand a hoax vaccine.

[–]GConly 11 insightful - 2 fun11 insightful - 1 fun12 insightful - 2 fun -  (11 children)

it's a highly lethal superbug.

My healthy eighteen year old went from a rower training for a marathon to having pneumonia and so much difficulty breathing we had to call ambulance. She's never even been particularly I'll with flu since she was a baby.

I've seen what it can't do first hand. This is way worse than flu, my health is pretty dicey and I want a sodding vaccine. There's a real risk it could kill me.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 9 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 0 fun10 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

This is way worse than flu, my health is pretty dicey and I want a sodding vaccine. There's a real risk it could kill me.

The flu has been pretty serious in the recent past, as well. 650,000 confined deaths from influenza in the 2017-2018 flu season.

There's a very real risk the vaccine could kill you, as well. Every previous vaccine for this has been a failure.

The handful of versions that made it to animal testing ultimately killed all of the animals the next time they encountered CV.

Relying on the safety of fastracked vaccine that hasn't been fully tested is an unacceptable risk; given the low fatality rate of CV 19.

It's a serious gamble.

[–]GConly 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I never said I wanted a fast tracked vaccine. I'm as lary of that anyone else.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

They are fastracking all of the coco vaccines.

[–][deleted] 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Listen, NOBODY is denying that there are SOME PARTICULAR fringe cases in which an otherwise inoffensive virus has dire consequences. Hell, some people die from eating fucking PEANUTS. I'm sorry about your kid going through rough times, I really am. But it's not because EXTREMELY RARE cases become serious that there has to be a so-called "vaccine", which have never done anything for human health to begin with.

Even Pasteur himself, who freaking INVENTED vaccines said on his death bed, "Tell Béchand I was wrong and he was right: the milieu is everything and the pathogen is insignificant". What does allopathic medicine do? Ignore the wisdom of one of its own greatest visionaries... BECAUSE PROFIT COULD BE HAD FROM DOING SO.

[–]LarrySwinger2 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

Vaccines are risky in general, and sometimes more deadly than the disease they're meant to prevent. And regardless, there isn't a vaccine right now. I recommend looking into other options such as exposing yourself to sunlight regularly, not isolating yourself (so as to keep your immune system intact), and taking Vitamine D pills.

[–]GConly 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

sometimes more deadly than the disease they're meant to prevent

That's utter bullshit.

[–]LarrySwinger2 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

No it isn't. See this paper, which examines the effects of DTP, a vaccine against diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis. From the conclusion:

DTP was associated with 5-fold higher mortality than being unvaccinated. No prospective study has shown beneficial survival effects of DTP. Unfortunately, DTP is the most widely used vaccine, and the proportion who receives DTP3 is used globally as an indicator of the performance of national vaccination programs. [...] All currently available evidence suggests that DTP vaccine may kill more children from other causes than it saves from diphtheria, tetanus or pertussis.

[–]GConly 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

https://www.who.int/vaccine_safety/committee/topics/dtp/statement112002/en/

Analysis of the WHO-sponsored studies is now complete. All the studies show reduced mortality rates in the children vaccinated with all of the vaccines. In particular, the studies showed no negative effect of DTP vaccination and no difference was found between males and females.

The Committee concluded that the evidence is sufficient to reject the hypothesis for an increased non-specific mortality following vaccination.

You're also not taking into account the lives saved by not getting these diseases. For example, mortality from diphtheria is about 20% in the under fives.

So the vaccination is nowhere near as dangerous as the disease

[–]LarrySwinger2 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

I have serious doubts about the reliability of WHO-sponsored studies, but even if it is reliable: those researchers simply came to a different conclusion, but that doesn't do anything to address the findings of the paper I linked to. You cited a paper from 2000, while I cited one from 2017. We know more now, so the 2017 one is much more relevant.

[–]72ndGender 10 insightful - 1 fun10 insightful - 0 fun11 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

100% agree. Every time we give a little more freedom, the rulers raise the bar on how much they will go after next time. No one cares about constitutional limitations of the government, apparently.

[–][deleted] 8 insightful - 4 fun8 insightful - 3 fun9 insightful - 4 fun -  (11 children)

I live in Asia and I cannot believe the carry-on in the US over wearing a mask? We masked up and you only have to look at the numbers to see it worked. Compare Asia to Europe and the US. Can't believe Americans crying, "Its my right as a Murican to breath germs all over people during a global pandemic. Something, something, bald eagles!"

[–]noice 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

The latter half of this comment is a straw man. May have been effective on Reddit, but not here.

Correlation does not equal causation. The science on the effectiveness of masks is not settled, and I think people in the US are questioning everything about the entire COVID narrative, because many things are NOT adding up.

Psychological, sociological effects are what I'm concerned about.

'Please wear a mask because you might have some hidden killer virus on your breath without even knowing it.' Think that's a good thing to sustain?

'look at Asia, they wear masks' - Yeah, and their cultures are not like the West. They're glad to not have interactions with people throughout the day; a big part of mask-wearing in those cultures is to keep people away, similar to having headphones in on public transport.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

They're glad to not have interactions with people throughout the day; a big part of mask-wearing in those cultures is to keep people away, similar to having headphones in on public transport.

Errrr, I dont know whether to laugh or cry at your ignorance here. If you think people in Asia don't have interactions with people in the day, I am pretty sure you have never been to any Asian country. Bloody hell, only an American would say something like this. Fuck.

Anyway, its no skin of my nose. The evidence is mounting that COVID causes serious lung damage in a lot of survivors. I am sad for Americans, but I live in a place where it has been very well controlled. We have had less cases in total than the Americans are getting in a day, all of Asia has.

[–]noice 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (7 children)

Don't need to be patronizing to me and call me ignorant and my thoughts laughable. The culture of mask wearing in asia is something I have read about prior to this pandemic. I will try to find a link to similar stuff.

I never said that people in asia don't have interactions. I said that the culture of mask-wearing is similar to that of having headphones in.

Edit: here's the link. Call me ignorant again for reading about things that interest me over many years.

https://www.weexpats.com/asian-face-masks-why-do-asians-wear-masks/

And an excerpt, for the lazy:

The most curious of all is that face masks are popular with younger generations because they act as a firewall from society, much like headphones. Studies have shown that many youths wear masks as a way to avoid interacting with society, or as a barrier from society to interact with them. In a world where interaction is done more often through social media, avoiding social interaction can be welcome.

Also, many women slip on a mask when they want to dash out to the store for something quick without having to put on makeup. Other Asian women wear masks as fashionable accessories, with specific masks that match their own outfits. Therefore, it has become a convenient way to look and feel attractive, while staying modest with one’s face hidden in a culture that values modesty without repression.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

Your ignorance (and borderline racism) is in saying people in Asia are happy not to interact with each other in the day. It is just so bloody ridiculous. Yes, mask wearing when unwell is a part of the culture which us why everyone masked up when the pandemic hit, and look at Asia compared to the US and Europe.

[–]noice 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Hahahahaha

Yeah, talking about culture is racist... ...

Read the article

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Racist is saying Asians don't interact with each other in the day.

I don't know if it's even racist as much as dead set one of the silliest things I've heard since the beginning of the pandemic. Look, you are obviously very young, so I'm going to leave it, but don't make sweeping statements about people when you have no idea what you are talking about because, if nothing else, you just look a fool. Take care

[–]sodomytron 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

put your muzzle on slave

[–]beermeem 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

No cost?

[–]Iam1ofMany 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

There is a huge cost. Business are unable to operate at full capacity. I can't imagine being a restaurant owner right now. They were probably already working on slim margins but now they can open but only half the people can come in that could before. You still have to pay for AC/heat, pay for lights, pay for the building, and all the other things that can't really be cut to stay up and running but have half the business. There is a huge cost in social distancing... the mask is a separate thing.

[–]IsraelDid911 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

There is literally a huge cost for businesses by mandating social distancing.

[–]ItchMcConnell 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

They are huge psychological costs in treating everyone around you like they are plague carriers. There are huge psychological costs in being treated like you are a plague carrier everywhere you go. There are huge psychological costs from not being close to people, not embracing ones we care about. Also they destroyed the economy without Corona and are blaming the virus to deflect any culpability.

[–]C3P0 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Even I would say it is a "superbug." Just about 1% of Americans caught it. That's pretty impressive. Can you think of any other virus that infected 1% of the US?

Given that, you make some good points.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Even I would say it is a "superbug." Just about 1% of Americans caught it. That's pretty impressive. >

My understanding of a superbug is a transmittable pathogen with significant risk (multiple percentage points) of high consequence outcomes (fatality, permanent disability, etc.)

Many people get the common cold on a yearly basis (double digit percentages), and it's not a superbug.

Can you think of any other virus that infected 1% of the US?

The common cold.

[–]C3P0 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You're right that COVID-19 is a low-risk bug.

The common cold.

The common cold is not one virus; it is a collection of many viruses which are a part of the same family.

[–][deleted] 19 insightful - 4 fun19 insightful - 3 fun20 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

Its a bioweapon according to Francis Boyle and Luc Montagnier which is why I'd go with "psy op" over "hoax" every time. Media is definitely exaggerating and misrepresenting the issue while causing mass hysteria.

[–]Jesus 11 insightful - 1 fun11 insightful - 0 fun12 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Questions to ponder:

Are the tests accurate?

Do the tests cross-react?

Have we seen COVID-19 u der a microscope?

Have we cultured it?

Are they messing with the statistics?

The latter questions seems to be an obvious yes. They are listing anyone who dies and who teated positive woth COVID but had zero symptoms as a COVID death. If millions have COVID, and older people are dying from other complications it wouldn't be hard to fake the death numbers.

[–]72ndGender 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Cause of death determinations are usually just opinions, so when a coroner or ME is being pressured (or forced) to label any death with Covid on board, as a covid death, it's very easy to pump the stats up. And like you mentioned, old people are constantly dying from other complications, so obviously we will have a lot of old people to label as covid deaths.

[–]Jesus 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It seems, however, the CDC and HIH are very happy with fraudulently bumping up the case numbers for specific viruses but disregard bacterial, spirochetal cases such as Borreliosis.

Not a lot of money to be had in terrible persistent spirochetal infections that cannot be curtailed with a vaccine due to antigenic variation although they tried to pass one off by falsifying the case def. of Botreliosis and rasiong the anti-body cut off standard to test the efficacy of a fake vaccine.

Remmeber, for bacterial infections and even Viruses, many times the sicker you are, the less positive you'll be on an antibody test due to anergy and an immunocompromised system.

[–]jet199 7 insightful - 3 fun7 insightful - 2 fun8 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

The trouble is there pressure to lockdown and panic has all come from ordinary people, most governments were dragging their feet. We just have a whole load of anxious people who are just looking for any excuse to panic and lock themselves in their room for months. And it's often the least at risk, young, people spreading panic the most.

I know 3 people who have locked themselves in their rooms and are convinced they will die of covid if they interact with anyone. They are all male, with social phobias, gamers and 2 are under 18. They are all spending their days on social media venting their panic, accusing the government of trying to kill people, etc because they have nothing else to worry about. This democratic is heavily represented online so it makes it seem like the public are demanding a heavy lock down, masks and authoritarian measures when actually its a minority of scared basement dwellers.

[–]BravoVictor 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yeah, I thought the people calling it a hoax were nuts. Then I saw thousands of Democrats marching in the streets, many not wearing masks, none social distancing, while their leaders cheered...right after calling the handful conservatives protesting the covid restictions "domestic terrorists".

The threat was definitely exaggerated. Whether it's intentional or not I'm unsure. I suspect the idiots in state government saw a high ~20-30% fatality rate from hospital admissions of covid, didn't realize that that suffered from a selection bias, misapplied it to the entire population and freaked out. But it's been months and better data is available. By now they have to know Covid isn't a serious concern. I'm seeing estimates making it little worse than the regular flu.

Everyone's now freaking out about the "rising covid case count", while they ignore the flat death rate. Yes, cases are rising in part because we're testing more and in part because idiot Democrats are ignoring the orders of their own Democrat leaders, but fatalities aren't rising in proportion. That's because it's nowhere near as deadly as originally reported.

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

It's just a new strain of THE COMMON COLD, which has been a "new coronavirus pandemic" every. single. year.

[–]AFutureConcern 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Agreed, "hoax" overstates the claim massively, though there's always a kernel of truth to any hoax.

[–]nothingmuch 41 insightful - 7 fun41 insightful - 6 fun42 insightful - 7 fun -  (41 children)

Oh, horseshit. First off, the diagnostic test checks your respiratory system for viral RNA. The antibody test checks your blood for antibodies, so if you get a surprise positive on that I means you're one of the lucky asymptomatic folks.

That said, I'll never believe it's a hoax because I've had it, and my wife had it worse, and it's NOT FUCKING FUN. I can very much see how it could push somebody who already has health problems over the brink.

Also the Democrats are far too incompetent to perpetuate a hoax of this magnitude.

[–]StBlops2cel_is_Lord 27 insightful - 3 fun27 insightful - 2 fun28 insightful - 3 fun -  (36 children)

it's NOT FUCKING FUN.

neither is the flu, which kills 500,000 people every year worldwide, but we don't shut down the entire world because of it.

[–]nothingmuch 22 insightful - 6 fun22 insightful - 5 fun23 insightful - 6 fun -  (25 children)

The rest of the world is opening back up, but Americans are too self-centered to wear masks. And we can apparently politicize anything.

No one with any sense thinks we can actually stop the virus. The idea is to keep the infection rate low enough for hospitals and medical suppliers to keep up. No one wants to lose Grandma to something that would be survivable if the system isn't overwhelmed.

[–]jonah 16 insightful - 6 fun16 insightful - 5 fun17 insightful - 6 fun -  (20 children)

the virus is 0.125 microns big, N95 masks, which nobody uses, protect down to 0.3 microns. essentially all you are doing when wearing a mask is creating a swamp of saliva around your face so you can spread covid into the wind. masks are just symbology for the cattle to prove to the cabal that we can be easily manipulated.

do your research before you regurgitate MSM propaganda.

[–]nothingmuch 21 insightful - 1 fun21 insightful - 0 fun22 insightful - 1 fun -  (17 children)

The virus isn't free floating, it travels in water particles. You're saying that the masks trap the particles and spread them at the same time, which makes no sense.

[–]jonah 9 insightful - 5 fun9 insightful - 4 fun10 insightful - 5 fun -  (16 children)

and what do you think happens when you have worn the same mask for months straight? i sincerely doubt that americans have changed their mask every day for the past few months. they are filled with bacteria and viruses assuming they are positive. when you continue to breathe on the mask coated in your saliva do you think it just continues to build? it has to go somewhere, and that somewhere is out into the air because nobody wears form fitting masks.

[–]nothingmuch 14 insightful - 1 fun14 insightful - 0 fun15 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

You must hang out with nastier people than I do, because most people I know do laundry on a regular basis.

[–]Red23 13 insightful - 4 fun13 insightful - 3 fun14 insightful - 4 fun -  (4 children)

You won't win against these retards mate.

[–]buttermouth 9 insightful - 5 fun9 insightful - 4 fun10 insightful - 5 fun -  (1 child)

Retards? The ones using science rather than anecdotal opinions? The wearing of masks is clearly not about stopping a disease but rather getting people used to taking new controls. You can wear a ski mask, silk mask, wooven mask, all which do nothing and everyone would be happy you are compliant. If it were about stopping a disease none of those would be acceptable.

[–]rdh2121 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I have yet to see any actual science in this sub. It's all baseless assertions backed up by conspiracy blogs and Youtube talking heads.

[–]jonah 7 insightful - 3 fun7 insightful - 2 fun8 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

so not only do you not switch masks, you break them down by washing them with all your other clothes? and you still think you are protecting people from covid lol

[–]Red23 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

Thanks, you've just proved my point :)

[–]jonah 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (7 children)

either you can't read or you have no argument. continue to virtue signal. it will get you nowhere with your lack of critical thinking skills

[–]Red23 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

You still talking?

[–]jonah 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

yes nigger i am. post an argument or go back to watching cnn

[–]GConly 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

The virus is carried in water droplets you moron. The masks will stop the infected breathing those over other people.

[–]jonah 6 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

open your fucking eyes, you are being lied to. the vast majority of the american public lacks the ability to understand symbolism, here is a wikipedia article so you can get up to speed. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Symbolism_(arts)

A water particle is able to go down to <60 microns. your piece of shit shred of cloth is not meant to protect down to that level. here is a webpage so you can understand the clinical applications of spray pesticides and the particle sizes they use. https://pesticidestewardship.org/pesticide-drift/understanding-droplet-size/ your hot dragon breath isn't coming out of that hole in your face you call a mouth like rain drops. it comes out in an extremely fine mist. you are spreading covid while simultaneously wearing a symbol of compliance, and are convinced of the complete opposite.

[–]IsraelDid911 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

No one in Sweden is wearing a mask right now either, but deaths per day keeps dropping lower and lower. And no one is chastizing them. This is political targeting against Americans.

The problem is not Americans refusing to wear masks, in fact America has no special problem with COVID. Many countries in Europe had it just as bad. Now we are simply seeing an increase in positive tests, along with an increase in overall testing and a decrease in deaths.

[–]StBlops2cel_is_Lord 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Let's ruin millions of people's lives so Grandma MIGHT live a few months longer, yes yes.

[–]Red23 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

[–]Jashfior 13 insightful - 1 fun13 insightful - 0 fun14 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

You can look at the number of deaths and compare it to the numbers a typical year, i.e. deaths caused by e.g. the flu. Way more people are dying this year than during a flu season, and this despite extreme measures keeping the infection rate relatively low compared to what it would be if it was allowed to spread as freely as the flu.

https://www.economist.com/graphic-detail/2020/04/16/tracking-covid-19-excess-deaths-across-countries

[–]StBlops2cel_is_Lord 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

There are more people on Earth this year than last year, the (non-white) population is growing, so of course there are more dead. Flu numbers fluctuate too.

[–]jelliknight 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

The coronavirus has already killed more people than that, and we're only halfway through the year, and it's still accelerating.

You need to update your conspiracy theory.

[–]StBlops2cel_is_Lord 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Cancer+virus=CORONA DEATH

Meningitis+virus=CORONA DEATH

Flattened by a steamroller+virus=CORONA DEATH

---see how that works?

[–]jelliknight 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

More people are dying total (some nice simple graphs for you here). What's your explanation for that? Everyone just got SUPER unlucky and really sick all at once, at the exact same time this new virus started spreading?

[–]StBlops2cel_is_Lord 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

People die every day for all kinds of reasons. This latest bullshit is not justification for shutting down the entire world, that is the whole point.

[–]GConly 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

My 18yo daughter had it. It's way worse than flu. She's a healthy athlete, she ended up on oxygen briefly.

Mortality from flu is about 0.1%, mortality from Covid about 0.5%.

We don't grind to a halt with flu because most of the at risk population gets vaccinated so the number of deaths per annum from it is a fraction if what it would be of it was running rampant like Covid is right now.

[–]StBlops2cel_is_Lord 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

For all you know she had the flu, AND tested positive for the dread Corona-chan. This is NOT the big bad boogeyman disease the [media] makes it out to be. Millions have lost their jobs, businesses have closed forever, countless people will lose their homes, but because your daughter had a cold you think it's all worth it.

[–]GConly 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I really doubt it.

[–]noice 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

IFR is estimated between 0.1 and 0.4, and that's across all ages. For people under 70 it's something miniscule like 0.05.

[–]72ndGender 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Anyone blaming democrats is missing the point. Dems are the pawn to spread the panic BECAUSE they are naive and emotional. Not like they concocted the entire situation, or bioengineered the virus.

Regarding the tests, did you read about them getting false positives for other forms of corona virus? I'm curious how prevalent that is. Also, did you see the two studies (USC and Stanford) that indicated that infection rates were exponentially higher than known cases? Really interesting studies and no one has conducted a study that can contradict them. They just criticize the studies instead. If they were accurate, then the virus has probably made it's way throughout the entire country by now. We will all get it by the end of the year. Lockdowns or not.

That being said, I got covid back in February/March and it was absolutely miserable. My family all got it from me and were barely sick. I couldn't get out of bed for a week. Even my elderly parents barely got sick. I guess I'm just the susceptible type.

[–]Hadroncollider 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

That’s kind of my thought too. I truly believe all of this is real and that your info on the types of testing is accurate. I think to believe that anyone is doing this on purpose requires that we give credit far more credit for organization and coordination to the group of people we accuse of making this up than anyone could reasonably deserve. No one is capable of pulling something like this off - the government can’t figure out so many basic things and it’s believable that they could manufacture a global pandemic? I don’t buy it

[–]noice 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You think billionaire parasites who own the media and therefore control the narrative of science couldn't use that power to cause a mass hysteria like we're seeing?

[–]ev1lchris 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

How much is George Soros paying you to say this?

[–]galaxybrain 28 insightful - 3 fun28 insightful - 2 fun29 insightful - 3 fun -  (10 children)

It's not actually a hoax though, it actually is a new virus circulating across the globe causing serious health issues. That much isn't even up for debate, if you even have a small circle of friends, you're sure to know someone that has it, or knows first-hand of someone who has had it.

We can discuss all day along about the reaction to the pandemic though, that's a totally different thing. But complaining about the reaction to a virus doesn't make the existence of the virus itself a hoax. That's a shitty argument.

If you pretend for one moment that you're not on Reddit, you can stop making a stupid thread title, and actually come with the facts. You don't think the reaction to this virus has been proportionate. Fair, that's absolutely fair. But don't use clickbait titles like "hoax".

Hoax has a simple meaning, and that's that everything is staged and based on no facts. That's demonstrably false. Are the measures taken by governments a bunch of bullshit? Arguably yes. But it doesn't make the virus a hoax.

Does the media misrepresent the facts? Undeniably. Do governments spread panic? Again, undeniably. I also agree that many deaths are counted as COVID-19 deaths when they aren't necessarily. They've taken something and no doubt blown it out of proportion, but we still have much to learn. But let's use factual language, eh. Sitting in a puddle of our own drool isn't a good look

[–]jelliknight 10 insightful - 1 fun10 insightful - 0 fun11 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

I also agree that many deaths are counted as COVID-19 deaths when they aren't necessarily.

The thing is, it works the other way too. In italy they went back after the peak of the corona has passed and did some 'death accounting'. They had a certain number of deaths attributed to corona, and you would assume that the deaths from all other causes (old age, traffic accidents, heart attack etc) would stay the same or decrease during the corona period (more old people dying of corona is fewer dying of pneumonia, lock down means fewer traffic accidents and workplace accidents). Instead they found that the death rate from non-corona causes went UP significantly during the peak of the pandemic compared to what was projected based on before/after/previous years. They looked into it further and found out that what was happening is that someone would get corona that was "asymptomatic" but it put a lot of stress on their system and have them a heart attack, or an asthma attack. We also have seen cases of people who 'recovered' from corona virus dying of a stroke (it causes blood clots). These cases were caused directly by the virus but were recorded as non-corona deaths. The death rate was actually much higher than they thought it was at the time.

In conclusion: -the virus is real -It's way more deadly and problematic than the flu -Lock down is the only proven way to stop it (well done New Zealand!), though tough distancing and hygiene measures (masks) can get pretty close to stopping it.

ETA: Here's a link with some nice simple graphs showing the effect, called 'excess mortality'

[–]Zahn 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

The mortality rate is 0.04% and primarily affects immuno compromised and elderly. Your link is spoonfed narrative propaganda. Stop pushing these unhinged black plague conspiracy theories.

[–]FediverseNetizen 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

You're off by an order of magnitude, bud, and even that number has a lot of uncertainty associated with it.

New York City has 8.4 million people, and about 23,000 deaths counted right now. That's a little over 0.25%, over 6x your claimed 0.04% rate. If you're going to accuse others of pushing unhinged conspiracy theories, then at least use some semi-plausible numbers that can stand up to some basic scrutiny.

[–]Zahn 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

And how many of those numbers are inflated with co-morbidity? How many of them are old or already immuno-compromised?

And how many Normal Seasonal Flu Cases are there in New York right now?

Hint: They're calling seasonal flu, Covid. From New York health department:

Seasonal influenza cases have been steadily declining during the Covid crisis. Also, we have discontinued doing any tracking of influenza while Covid is going around. So we can't tell you how many seasonal flu infections there are.

https://nyshc.health.ny.gov/web/nyapd/new-york-state-flu-tracker

How convenient.

[–]jelliknight 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

This is not true. You need to look at the death rate vs the recovery rate, not the death rate vs the population.

[–]Zahn 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Average of 99.8+% recovery. Do.more.research. Ignore Msm, dig deeper. You can do it!!

[–]jelliknight 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

No it isn't. Globally the rate of death is 10% the rate of recovery. You must be talking about the current deathtoll vs the total global population, which is nonsense.

[–]Zahn 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Bumping an 11 day old post to push your fear mongering? Just because you're scared of a flu doesn't mean that you deserve the right to push your tin foil hat nut job conspiracy theories. Statistical collection in 3rd world countries is circumspect to enormous errors.

Post your proofs of a 10% death rate of any US state....or just stay huddled in some dark corner with muffled crying from underneath your state sanctioned face muzzle, living in terror of a flu. Pathetic.

99% recovery is a fact, science denier.

[–]BettysBitterButter 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yep. I personally know one person who has died from it and five others who got sick with it. The official death rate might be in the 1-5% range, but one out of six people I know who have gotten it has died and they're not all recovered, yet.

[–]worldowedexplanation 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

No it isn’t. I live in Chicago and I still don’t know a single sick person. I have an autoimmune disease so I should be incredibly vulnerable, but I don’t walk around in a bullshit face mask doily.

I took a road trip to 9 states in the last 2 months and if I were going to catch this highly contagious deadly virus I would have gotten it.

I don’t think it even exists. I think there was a bad flu strain. Last year March 2019 my boyfriend and I both got a horrible flu, and I get the flu every year. I am not afraid of bullshit coronahoax.

[–]VantaFount 20 insightful - 4 fun20 insightful - 3 fun21 insightful - 4 fun -  (16 children)

I agree with nearly everything you've said, except for one point.
It's not just democrats pushing this.

[–]iraelmossadreddit 13 insightful - 2 fun13 insightful - 1 fun14 insightful - 2 fun -  (14 children)

They are all one in the same... Trump was a democrat then changed to republican for the election.

oh actually

Trump registered as a Republican in Manhattan in 1987 and since that time has changed his party affiliation five times. In 1999, Trump changed his party affiliation to the Independence Party of New York. In August 2001, Trump changed his party affiliation to Democratic. In September 2009, Trump changed his party affiliation back to the Republican Party. In December 2011, Trump changed to "no party affiliation" (independent). In April 2012, Trump again returned to the Republican Party.[3]

[–][deleted] 8 insightful - 3 fun8 insightful - 2 fun9 insightful - 3 fun -  (12 children)

delusional maga q believers told me trump was being a dem then to infiltrate and sabotage them back then

[–]Zahn 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (11 children)

Found the Reddit provocateur.

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 4 fun4 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 4 fun -  (10 children)

direct opposite you are, just came here cuz reddit banned subs, you're retarded and low IQ and against masks just cuz trump says so. Go to that trump.win site or voat.

[–]soundsalad 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (8 children)

You calln me retarded furreal dwag tha fuck man like mb you shuld just go 2 rukkus er sum shit

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (7 children)

yea you're retarded, take the L kid

[–]Zahn 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (6 children)

You're long on ad hominems, and short on cogent arguments. One of us is certainly low Iq. Take the cyanide pill, kid.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

stfu

[–]soundsalad 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Bru you rly guna just tell me 2 stfu like dat

[–]Zahn 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

You have very low self control. Hmmm...

[–]worldowedexplanation 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Oh great. This site has turned into garbage reddit already.

[–]Aureus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I'm a conservative Republican and I don't see the problem. It feels goofy to hold Trump's party affiliation 10 years ago against him now.

[–]JasonCarswellPlatinum Foil Fedora 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

^

[–][deleted] 12 insightful - 9 fun12 insightful - 8 fun13 insightful - 9 fun -  (5 children)

covid19: that year when the flu was a bit worse than usual

[–]jelliknight 6 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 3 fun -  (3 children)

4x worse than normal in number of deaths in the USA so far, and we're only halfway through the year, and it's accelerating.

So 'quite a bit' worse than normal.

[–]magnora7 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

A lot of pnemonia deaths were diagnosed as covid, which you can see in the corresponding humongous drop in pnemonia deaths as compared to every other year. So the overall number of deaths is not much different.

[–]jelliknight 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Not true. Google 'excess mortality COVID'

[–]Hadroncollider 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

No, the decrease in pneumonia death can be explained by the social distancing and stay at home measures that were eventually taken.

[–]FormosaOolong 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

I'm stealing this

[–]legendaryabyssking 13 insightful - 3 fun13 insightful - 2 fun14 insightful - 3 fun -  (9 children)

Dude, airborne viruses are usually epic killers. You would see two or three times the death of it really was airborne

I think this is a dry run for how much they can push people without resistance. You would think social distancing would stop protests for BLM but nope. People are marching in the street. Covid is only dangerous to old people and the weak. Average people are usually safe. If a man made virus they made sure it wasn’t too strong, because it could kill them too. This is exaggerated for political reasons.

[–][deleted] 12 insightful - 2 fun12 insightful - 1 fun13 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

You would think social distancing would stop protests for BLM but nope.

Those protests are sanctioned by the powers that shouldn't be. I was ready to protest the lockdown after a week but I was considered a public safety risk because of that intention. Suddenly, a little while later, everyone thinks its okay to protest but only for one specific reason. If you want to protest anything else, you're still a risk to public health. It is such nonsense, the hive mind is oozing with cognitive dissonance right now

[–][deleted] 9 insightful - 2 fun9 insightful - 1 fun10 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

You would see two or three times the death of it really was airborne... You would think social distancing would stop protests for BLM but nope.

If it is really such an epidemic, why aren't like half of the BLM protestors dead? That would be my main question. If people aren't dying by literally going out in to large groups, what rationale is there even for a lockdown and a forceful shutdown of business? Makes no sense to me, I still don't know anyone that has died from covid

[–][deleted] 11 insightful - 2 fun11 insightful - 1 fun12 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

BLM is retarded, they shouldn't be allowed to protest but:

  1. protesting is a constitutional right

  2. lockdown orders from states because Trump and the feds aren't doing anything

  3. States aren't really ordering by law anything it's more like suggesting, for example if you held a big party, the cops would come and tell you to stop it, they wouldn't actually arrest you or give you a fine.

  4. People would call out BLM but they don't want to be called racist and cancelled.

[–]GConly 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

It's way less deadly to the young as a group. Virtually call Covid deaths are in the seventy plus age range. Not many protesters that old.

Plus it also doesn't seem to survive daylight well, so if you are outside during the day the odds of catching it are really low.

[–]Hadroncollider 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I would also say that as a member of these protests we’re all wearing masks. To me that suggests the efficacy of masks and hand sanitizer bc there are situations where it’s gotten crowded and statistically one person probably has coronavirus in a protest that large but no BLM protesters I know of have gotten Covid (and if I see evidence to the counter I’ll absolutely change my mind.) masks were passed out at protests I’ve attended and people have shared hand sanitizer. To me this solidifies that we can try to go back to work and school, we just need to be diligent about mask wearing and hand washing/sanitation.

[–]Robin 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I hope you're wrong on this. But yeah, might bĕ a dry run for Covid- 20.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

you'd see that but lockdown and masks is slowing it

[–]FediverseNetizen 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Dude, airborne viruses are usually epic killers. You would see two or three times the death of it really was airborne

...it's..it's not airborne. I don't know who told you it was.

[–]King_Brutus 11 insightful - 1 fun11 insightful - 0 fun12 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

COVID positive tests and death counts are one thing and subject to manipulation. But I think that actual hospitalizations are what should be looked at because that's what's going to be the problem. Overwhelming the system can have worse effects than anything.

[–][deleted] 9 insightful - 3 fun9 insightful - 2 fun10 insightful - 3 fun -  (8 children)

repub gov of texas orders masks, not just a dem thing

[–]JasonCarswellPlatinum Foil Fedora 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

^

[–]Velocity 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

Mostly a Dem thing though.

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (5 children)

true, on average they're smarter

[–]Velocity 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

Oh okay that really explains everything. Can you at least try to intelligently contribute?

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

take the L kid

[–]Velocity 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Like I said, try some intelligent contribution for a change.

[–]noice 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Do you have a salient point? How can 'kid' 'L' if you don't put up an argument?

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

take the L kid

[–]DrStrangelove 8 insightful - 2 fun8 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Agree, but it's not just democrats. It's virtually every government, multinational corporation, academic institution, NGO, and foundation on the planet. The real disease threatening all of humanity right now isn't covid, it's Stockholm Syndrome.

[–]FormosaOolong 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

1000%

[–]JasonCarswellPlatinum Foil Fedora 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

^

[–]hylia 6 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 3 fun -  (10 children)

What does the Democratic Party benefit from if this is indeed a hoax?

[–]King_Brutus 6 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 3 fun -  (7 children)

What I've seen is that it is being played up to make Trump looked bad so every decision he makes they can criticize as well as point to him for being at fault for every downturn of the pandemic.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

the idea is to rile up the dem base and get them to vote. In 2016 not enough of them came out to vote for Hillary, and now we have Biden who similarly no one is excited about. Will it work, we shall see. I think they equally pissed off people, moderates who hate seeing blacks loot, they may switch from a Biden or stay at home to Trump due to that.

[–]FarmerGD 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Excuse me, didn't Clinton win the popular vote in 2016? Riling up left-leaning voters likely won't make a difference, as most places where these nonvoting voters are already Democrat controlled. If more people voted Democrat, but these people already did so in Democrat controlled states, how would this make a difference in the electoral college, as these Democrat controlled states have an all-or-nothing elector system? If they want to improve their chances, they need to steal states they don't control. For every left voter they rile up, they affect a right voter also. The Democrats want nothing more than slander: they know they can't win outright with sleepy Joe, so they have to demonize their opponents draw support. However, those that they are trying to steal see their efforts as bullshit, at least largely. The Democrats, in an attempt to draw voters from across the aisle, have instead made themselves look foolish, underhanded, and destructive.

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

5 times prez's have won without popular vote, only electoral college matters. Voting really doesn't matter except it can pressure electors in swing states to go along with how the vote went, and none have gone against that yet. Hillary didn't even bother to campaign in rust belt, probably know she had no chance but still. Should have known then she'd lose in that case, and in that case a case can be made that she lost on purpose so the rich could get tax cuts.

Where are a lolt of these BLM things happened, rust belt. Also swing states. Sure all over USA but places minnesota where floyd died are a swing state. You're right it may also piss off repub voters in said swing states. Hard for me to predict this one cuz a lot of weird stuff is going on, covid hurting the economy, BLM.

[–]SeasonedReason 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Excuse me, didn't Clinton win the popular vote in 2016?

Discounting the votes of non-citizens and the dead, no, she didn't.

[–]FarmerGD 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Fair point

[–]jelliknight 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

IF it was a hoax, it'd be one that benefited the republicans.

Who's refusing to wear masks? Who's refusing to lock down and stay inside? Not democratic voters. And with the republicans fighting tooth and nail to prevent mail votes (which are totally fine, every other nation does postal votes and it doesn't cause fraud), and the virus still accelerating, it will be the democrats who stay home for safety instead of standing in line in a crowded public space. Black voters also are more susceptible to the virus, and more likely to vote democrat.

IF it is a hoax (it isn't) it's one that's FOR Trump.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

so you ask who is refusing masks and lockdowns, it is reoubs yes but also people that just don't usually care to vote, people that don't pay attention to politics in the first place. Dems are ones that need a high turnout to win. Repubs wouldn't mind if these people either stay home, or sure vote repub, that of course can't hurt trump. Why do these people stay home why do they not care, because well they don't see a difference in parties, they figure the economy is the same either way, which is the most important topic. If we see a terrible economy you see people coming out to vote dem such as in 2008.

[–]rdh2121 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

And what about the rest of the world? Are they in on it with the Democrats?

[–]Mein_Tarnaccount 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It was just half a million pranks, bro. Covid is a conspiracy to get us to wear masks so security cameras and facial recognition software become less effective. So they can control us better. Because that makes complete sense.

[–]gravyontop 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

won't be surprised if they have something weird going on with the swabs they TEST with

[–]jonah 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

read an article that said a lot of the walgreens and generic health store tests were already infected with covid. maybe to get people sick, maybe to inflate the positives. you don't just slap together medical tests. they SHOULD be created in sterile environments. the only way they would have been infected is if it was on purpose.

[–]beermeem 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Hospitals get an extra $13k for saying a death was covid and $40k for putting someone on a ventilator. The reports that make these numbers don't even have to be made by doctors but by self interested administrators. And none of us has any idea what they are being told.

[–]WooWhoVintage 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (28 children)

"Survival of the fittest" is a phrase that originated from Darwinian evolutionary theory

So I find it amazing how people that believe the most in Darwin fight against allowing Darwinian principles to happen. We should just keep moving forward and let any disease run its course. Those who will live will live and those who will die will die.

[–]galaxybrain 8 insightful - 2 fun8 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 2 fun -  (13 children)

Darwinian theory is simply survival of the good enough to pass on their genes. To procreate. It has sod-all to do with how fit they are.

Let's not see evolution as some perfect filter; especially in the human space, where we can overcome many of our shortcomings through supplements, medicine and surgery.

If you want to get back in to the arguments about "fittest", then we're going to the classic eugenics arguments made 50+ years ago. Nothing new.

[–]WooWhoVintage 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (10 children)

It is survival of the fittest. If Covid-1984 kills you then you don't get to procreate and pass on your genes.

[–]galaxybrain 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

What about a guy who donated to a sperm bank a while back?

In this day and age, you can be stone-cold dead and pass on your genes

[–]WooWhoVintage 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

All I'm saying is let diseases run their course.

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

we can use civilzation to help make sure humanity doesn't go extinct. We never would have survived things like the black plague, spanish flu and polio if humans hadn't taken actions.

[–]WooWhoVintage 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The problem is we've been surviving things like the Black Plague for more than 50 thousand years. We've been dealing with diseases long before ancient Mesopotamia.

[–]galaxybrain 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Yeah, that's something else, and I basically agree that's the likely outcome in this case.. we can do what we want against this disease, but eventually it's probably going to kill all the people it was going to kill.

After all, we still don't have a vaccine for SARS-CoV, and that outbreak started in 2002

[–]WooWhoVintage 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

I did some personal research about "Coronaviruses" and was surprised to discover:

  • 1. In any given year, up to 33% of cases of the common Cold are caused Cronaviruses and not the traditional Rhinoviruses.
  • 2. Scientists have known about Coronaviruses since 1930 and they've been studying them in humans since the 1960s

This is nothing new that we have... There's always been a multitude of Cold viruses and there will never be a cure for the common Cold. So... In my opinion we should just cut the crap and get on with living our lives.

[–]galaxybrain 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I'm not disagreeing with any of that post, just to be clear... It's definitely correct, I was just saying that "survival of the fittest" is something that's often misused..

This virus may not be defeatable in any traditional sense, and that's something we'll have to live (or die) with

I appreciate you taking the time to actually respond, so I could explain myself.. it's already more than most people on Reddit do

You're also right about the "common cold" being sometimes caused by coronaviruses and not rhinoviruses these days, I've heard that myself, which also surprised me, because I'd been taught the cold was a rhinovirus

[–]Kimgeik 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

The common cold is a coronavirus. There's also a few other strains of coronavirus, one of which is pretty lethal for older people. Covid-19 is a new coronavirus. It is new. To say covid-19 isn't new because the common cold is a coronavirus too is like saying a cold sore and genital herpes are the same since they're both herpesvirus. Covid-19, or SARS-Cov-2, is more closely related to SARS than the common cold and we can all be massively relieved it isn't as lethal. Though SARS wasn't nearly as infectious.

[–]WooWhoVintage 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

New or old. It wasn't any worse than the flu or the common cold.

[–]anarchy753 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Our species has evolved to the point where we can pass on genes more reliably that JUST being able to have sex and have a child at the current moment. We also keep people alive through medicine in situations that would otherwise kill them.

As a species we've raised the evolutionary fitness of the weak links, but they're still considered fit because those options exist.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

like a peacocks tail is huge and makes it harder for him to escape predators

[–]galaxybrain 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Good example.. there are many examples of why evolution isn't "perfect", because everything is trying to out-compete each other, compensating all the time, but screwing up along the way. But if you're lucky enough to pass your genes on, then the cycle continues.

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (11 children)

and people that say evolution is fake are most likely to believe in survival of the fittest

[–]WooWhoVintage 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (10 children)

I believe in trusting God.

Sure enough, I'm not stupid, so I do things like wear a seat belt when driving. However, there are times when when you need to accept the fact that what will be will be. We shut down the Western economy, told people to avoid each other, passed dress code laws and shamed everyone that just wanted to work. So we should have just accepted the fact that some rotten things were going to happen to good people. Instead we made sure that rotten people got rich and powerful because of it.

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

masks are like seatbelts

[–]WooWhoVintage 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

  • Wearing a seatbelt to avoid going through a windshield is one thing.

  • Making me responsible for someone else's health and mandating that I have to change my lifestyle is entirely something else.

No one is preventing any individual from wearing a mask, a hazmat suit, using portable air machines or sealing themselves inside their home. The individual needs to take responsibility for their health and not the general public.

[–]jonah 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

dont listen to this virtue signaling shit lord named Popper. he literally has no arguments and just bitches and moans.

[–]WooWhoVintage 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

There's a lot of that going around these days

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

well it is hard to tell someone has it until they already coughed on you, and low IQ people like yourself are more likely to think you're fine and spread it

[–]WooWhoVintage 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

LOL... You're a very entertaining fellow.

So I'll tell you what, I'll let you cough on me.

[–]BettysBitterButter 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

No one is preventing any individual from wearing a mask, a hazmat suit, using portable air machines or sealing themselves inside their home.

That's incorrect. Many employers refused to allow their employees to wear masks until the governments started mandating it. Even hospitals and nurshing homes.

[–]WooWhoVintage 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Many employers refused to allow their employees to wear masks until the governments started mandating it. Even hospitals and nurshing homes.

Quit your job if you don't like the conditions of your employment. The last I checked this is still a free country and you can do anything you want with your life. Find another job or go into business for yourself and make your own rules.

[–]BettysBitterButter 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

You said no one is preventing anyone from wearing a mask. When I pointed out that's false you completely changed your argument. So you concede.

[–]WooWhoVintage 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

No I didn't change my argument.

When you go to work for someone you have 2 choices.

  • 1.To accept the terms of employment (ie: no masks allowed)
  • 2. To not accept the terms of employment. (ie: you will *not** work without a mask)*

It really is that simple.

So if your employer is asking you to do something (or not do as the case maybe) then be a grown up and go find another job. No one is pointing a gun at anyone's head telling them to not wear a mask.

.

Once again no one is preventing you from wearing a mask, hazmat suit, etc.

[–]magnora7 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Now "The fittest" are the people who don't fall for the tricks of the media and authoritarians

[–]jelliknight 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

People use that term wrong. 'The fittest' is in context. Sometimes 'the fittest' is the one that hides and waits for danger to pass, so that it can pass on its genetics while the stupider animals run out and get themselves killed. Sometimes "the fittest" are the ones that work together for the common good instead of bickering and working against each other.

[–]NorfolkTerrier 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

There are plenty of tests that test for active infections. That's still the majority being done.

The fear-mongering is absurd and will have costs likely far above those of the pandemic. Part of the hysteria in the US is likely rooted in anti-Trump attitudes (especially considering the STAY THE FUCK HOME crowd poofed for a couple weeks after George Floyd's death), but it seems largely unplanned.

I think at this point, many politicians are afraid to move forward. As long as the pandemic is perceived as a current threat, people won't start getting mad about the economy, livelihoods, the looming mental health crisis, the destruction of kids' education, civil liberties violations, etc because they'll see those as secondary concerns. The minute the average person sees COVID as "over," people are going to be PISSED.

Personally I think that corona is neither a huge deal nor is it nothing. It's a moderately serious issue. The human brain, especially in our garbage media environment, is bad at identifying that middle ground. When I realized the initial narrative was bullshit, I definitely started to swing towards the "fuck this, it's nothing" camp. NY never needed 40,000 ventilators, "exponential growth" never overran our hospitals, the field hospitals were empty, and it turned out that COVID was already all over the West as early as December and no one really noticed. Still, I also remember predicting that this shit would be in the rearview mirror by June, that the death count would never pass 100K, and that there would be no spike in cases (though I think the protests caused this in all areas without functional herd immunity).

[–]teelo 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I'm in one of the few countries that got a headstart on it: closed the border early and quarantined the few people who already had it. Now theres no cases left here and we quarantine anyone entering the country. The rest of us go about our lives like normal, and the economy lives on.

It definitely exists, and the governments don't gain anything from imposing quarantines. It hurts the economy, which makes the government looks bad.

The main part thats bullshit is deciding that anyone who died during this period died because of Covid, no matter what. Your country is the only one doing that.

[–]jelliknight 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The main part thats bullshit is deciding that anyone who died during this period died because of Covid, no matter what. Your country is the only one doing that.

No country is doing that. Look up 'excess mortality'. Most nations are underestimating their corona death toll.

[–]paranoid_android3 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

This meta-analysis paper by Stanford epidemiologist says the IFR, the Infected Fatality Rate, the only number you should care about, is about the same as the flu.

https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.05.13.20101253v2

When limited to people <70 years old, IFR ranged from 0.00% to 0.26% with median of 0.05% (corrected, 0.00-0.23% with median of 0.04%). All IFR estimates in people <70 years old did not exceed 0.1%, with the exception of New York, Wuhan and Milan.

i.e. it's blown out of all proportion to it's danger, IMHO.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Ioannidis

More about Ioannidis:

From 1998 to 2010, he was chairman of the Department of Hygiene and Epidemiology, University of Ioannina School of Medicine. In 2002 he became an adjunct professor at Tufts University School of Medicine.[5][3] He has also been President of the Society for Research Synthesis Methodology.[3] He is highly-cited, having an h-index of 196 on Google Scholar in 2020.[6]

Ioannidis is now Professor of Medicine, Health Research and Policy and of Biomedical Data Science, at Stanford University School of Medicine and a Professor, by courtesy, of Statistics at Stanford University School of Humanities and Sciences.[7][8] He is director of the Stanford Prevention Research Center, and co-director, along with Steven N. Goodman, of the Meta-Research Innovation Center at Stanford (METRICS).[9][10]

He was the editor-in-chief of the European Journal of Clinical Investigation from 2010 to 2019.[11]

[–]beermeem 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Exactly what I've been saying about the death numbers the whole time, too. Everyone is just too filled with fear from refreshing google every 30 seconds.

[–]jonah 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (11 children)

iirc <10% of covid deaths are actually caused by covid. yeah covid is real but who really gives a shit if people die? i mean its bad to say but jfc this is life. it ends in death if you weren't aware. there is not substantial evidence that masks prevent the virus nor is there substantial evidence that social distancing does as well.

the lockdown is a way to close small businesses and cripple the economy then pass bills that make big business richer. it is also a way for media companies to play in fears and profit. it is also a way to encroach on our already dwindling privacy.

if you don't want to get sick, stay home and take care of yourself. your health is not my responsibility.

[–][deleted] 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (8 children)

who really gives a shit if people die?

bad post

[–]jonah 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

thank you for this rare insight and for proving me wrong. i really appreciate all the hard work that went into your reply. i am a changed man. go back to fucking reddit

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

take the L kid

[–]jonah 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

sure nigger. lets see how free speech this forum really is

[–]noice 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Look into the origins and intent of this website. It's not just a 'free speech' site

[–]jonah 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

https://saidit.net/s/SaidIt/comments/j1/the_saiditnet_terms_and_content_policy/

Sure its not blatantly stated, but there are no rules against any type of speech other than nothing illegal and no porn. Seems to me like that is a "free speech" website. Hopefully it will last. Seems like the majority of posters aren't red pilled beyond bipartisanship.

[–]noice 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Have you looked at the pyramid of debate and considered where your comments would fall? If a user drags discussion down the pyramid of debate, they may be banned.

[–]jonah 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I have not started any conversations where I drag down the conversation. I have only shit posted in response to shit posting. If I get banned I don't really give a shit either way. I'll just make a new account until they IP ban me.

[–]noice 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Not exactly the response I'd like, but I see your viewpoint. Just personally trying to encourage good discussions in a (so-far) excellent website.

[–]jelliknight 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

<10% of covid deaths are actually caused by covid

You are incorrect. I don't know where you're getting your facts from, but they aren't facts.

nor is there substantial evidence that social distancing does as well.

New Zealand totally eliminated the virus using only social distancing and quarantining affected people. They haven't had a single case in a month (if you look at news they try to spin it that NZ has had new 'outbreaks'. No. All those cases were new zealanders returning from overseas and were in quarantine when they were identified. Zero new cases found in the community in a month and testing continues).

All of life has some risk. Walking down the street is a risk, but so is jumping out of a plane without a parachute. Most of us draw a line on risk somewhere; driving a car = yes, Russian roulette = no. The current US death rate is more than one in 8 and there good reason to think that's probably underestimating it rather than overestimating. So it's closer to Russian roulette.

Across the United States, there were 95 235 reported deaths officially attributed to COVID-19 from March 1 to May 30, 2020. In comparison, there were an estimated 122 300 (95% prediction interval, 116 800-127 000) excess deaths during the same period link/

[–]noice 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

IFR is estimated at 0.26% by the US CDC. Doesn't sound like Russian roulette to me

[–]mattdon 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Does anybody here have Covid ? Does anybody here know somebody with Covid ? Does anybody here know somebody who knows somebody with Covid ?

[–]Countach_3D 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

[–]mattdon 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Thank you this is exactly right. Perfect.

[–]BettysBitterButter 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I know six people who have had it and one of them died of it.

[–]anarchy753 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yep, a disease that started in China, and affects every country across the world is a "hoax" by your government, just because it's fun to fuck with people.

This has killed hundreds of thousands of people around the world, at least have some fucking respect for the dead rather than dismissing their lives as a hoax.

[–]Jambi 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Media using it to make you fear. Also to click on their news headliners. Its all about money. Money and fear.

[–]72ndGender 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Just want to make a relevant, but tangential point. During the Regan administration, the fairness doctrine was repealed, allowing the media to legally lie and they no longer had to present both sides of an issue. During the Obama administration, the Smtih-Mundt act was modified to allow state funded propaganda to be displayed to American audiences (instead of just foreign audiences) through existing media sources.

With these two changes (and a few more less relevant ones) the media has the legal ability to create/stage the news, lie, present government lies, and be paid to do all of it. Something to think about.

[–]avena_sativa_3 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

This is dumb, look at excess mortality numbers.

[–]mongre[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

They test antibodies. The test has, at best, as sucky error margin. Everyone has high antibodies. Companies are requiring testing. People coming out of hiding. More tests-higher results.

Deaths are being financially incentivised to attriube to covid.

LoL if you get bit by a shark and show up in the emergency room, they're going to test you for covid. If you die on the table, you're a covid death. Hospital gets compensated by the legislature for covid deaths and there's numerous examples of pressure to list normal deaths as covid.

[–]avena_sativa_3 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

There's a bigger data set available than the states where these supposed incentives exist.

[–]M_aze 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

How do you explain the crazy high cases only happening in USA and not so much the rest of the world?

[–]mongre[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

They test antibodies. The test has, at best, as sucky error margin. Everyone has high antibodies. Companies are requiring testing. People coming out of hiding. More tests-higher results.

[–]automatik 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Maybe the Robert Malone episode on Joe Rogan will change that now. I think that man qualifies as a loud voice.

[–]ChristianSonnenkreuz 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Hardly anybody in this country caught it in January and February. And the test is a nose swab that uses PCR to detect viral shedding. They're not confusing non-contagious people with leftover antibodies with infections. Furthermore the death rate is far higher than the flu, the CFR being about 5% on average which the death distribution way skewed towards the old of course. The flu doesn't do that.

[–]mongre[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

that uses PCR to detect viral shedding Not related to covid.

Viral overload based purely on your immune system's response level, not a chemical test to detect the specific virus, covid.

There are over 40 different strains of the cold/flu in circulation.

[–]Odysseus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I disagree. I have family in several countries and I have no reason to doubt them. How would the democrats create a worldwide hoax and why would some countries fair better than others? My perception is that Anglo-American exceptionalism and the general monoglotism of English speaking nations has blinded the UK and the US to sensible action. In both cultures the idea of the mask versus freedom has been rife and it has been absurd. Thousands of people have died, and the flu wave this winter will kill many survivors who have suffered lung damage.

[–]mongre[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

My perception is that Anglo-American exceptionalism and the general monoglotism of English speaking nations has blinded the UK and the US to sensible action.

What' does language have to do with it?

This is very perceptive and true with the absence of race. Cultures, yes but race and language is not the issue. This is about power. Greed and financial control of a new government for the planet.

We're constantly distracted. Divided.

Covid is 3.0 level disruption, psyops.

Good job if your efforts included contingencies for the level of casualty this country is about to endure but terrible if your goal got away from you.

B|