all 9 comments

[–]magnora7 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

I agree. The Secret Service was created to move money between the big banks.

So does that imply that the president is merely an asset of the big banks, being transported around? It certainly seems to.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I posit that the money system is the most important topic in politics which is never discussed.

[–]everythings 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

This is accurate. Money controls the flow of the world.

Watch the hidden secrets of money https://youtu.be/jkYCwBm4KYY

[–]Robin 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I think they don't want the president counterfeiting the bankers' control :-)

[–]iraelmossadreddit 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

A secret service agent could have shot JFK... It would be pretty hard to vett all of them yourself if you are president so they can use them to kill you.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

yeah that's kind of what I'm hinting at and wanted to see if any followed the logic.

So I think James Garfield was against a central bank so killed by a patsy for it. Abe Lincoln too possibly for greenbacks. secret Service was started in 1865 to round up all the greenbacks in circulation. They tried to kill Andrew Jackson. After Mickinley was killed in 1901 people finally started wondering if it was safe to be a president. The bankers decided a better idea was to have their personal agents guard the president, the secret service who had been in charge of the money supply. Seems like a wild coincidence otherwise right? Why not a branch of the military or something. I think other presidents that weren't killed did know the risks and were afraid of being killed by the money power so they sold out.

[–]iraelmossadreddit 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

It is definently possible. I've always wondered how they pick who guards the president. Trump has already had 3 different directors of the secret service since hes been in office.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

great name btw

[–]iraelmossadreddit 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

James Garfield

thanks. so I just learned it's illegal for the president to refuse protection from the secret service. that's insane.

Title 18 of the United States Code, Section 3056,