If we allow them in, we can remain totally neutral to religious beliefs. If we do not, we open the door to discriminating against any religions: If prots are in charge, catholics are banned, vice versa, on and on.
BUT, on the other hand, if we let them in, we need to remember that they honor and hold in high esteem, a serial pedophile who sucked the tongues of little boys and fucked a 9 year old girl.
I'm torn about this. On one hand, I'd prefer a government that only regulates actions and not thoughts. On the other hand, if you think pedophilia is not intrinsically immoral, how can we trust your thought won't turn into an action?
I'm thinking of a possible morality question on the citizenship test about pedophilia. If you fail (which all Muslims who know about Aisha will), then we can say it is your MORALS and not your RELIGION that is the reason we're not letting you off the boat.
[–]fschmidt 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun - (7 children)
[–]Rah 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
[–]Jiminy 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - (4 children)
[–]ForbiddenKnowledge[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (3 children)
[–]Jiminy 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (2 children)
[–]fschmidt 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - (1 child)
[–]Jiminy 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
[–]chadwickofwv 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)
[–]payalbatra 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun - (0 children)
[–]Brewdabier 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - (0 children)