all 12 comments

[–]fezhose 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I guess you're assuming that Biden won't run in 2024? Because if he does, then of course Kamala Harris could not or would not run. Then she could run for president in 2028.

But if Biden signals that he won't run in 2024, then sure, she would likely be the Democrat nominee. If she lost the election, would Biden resign in November so she could be a lame duck for a month?

No, that would never happen. It would be a direct contravention of the will of the electorate. Congress would never go for it, and it would be a huge risk for Democrats for no gain. If voters were likely to care enough about the first female president to reward Democrats for such a maneuver, well then they would've elected Harris.

[–]Zapped[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I like your answer.

[–]cm18 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

The real question: Can America survive till 2024?

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Thumbs up for the first smart question i am asking myself.

Maybe i turn the spotlight on "else" places, but you get the picture.

[–]Pis-dur 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Is it doing so badly?

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

If Trump doesn't run...

Biden isn't going to run in 2024, he won't be strong enough to defeat just about any serious Republican challenger even if he was physically and mentally up for a second term.

That's a huge problem right now, the right has a ton of former liberals like myself who will be voting with them because we don't like the alt-left in charge.

The idea was they'd just run Kamala, but they don't want another Hillary and it doesn't look like she has or will have the popularity either.

I think what they're going to do is both step down, pat themselves on the back for "Saving Democracy from Trump," and cry behind closed doors. Leave the race to challengers who actually have a chance.


If Trump does run they gain back a lot of the lost liberals who dislike Trump so Kamala will be a viable candidate.

[–]Zapped[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I like this answer, too.

[–][deleted]  (3 children)

[deleted]

    [–]fezhose 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

    the media was unanimously in the tank for Clinton, and she still lost

    [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    They tried to run an unpopular candidate because she wielded the considerable Clinton political capital they have. She was owed. I think you both have good points, but Hillary should never have been a candidate and hopefully they won't make that mistake again.

    [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    She is already the President.

    [–]thefirststone 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Who needs elections when you have Amendment 25 and dementia?

    They project and telegraph everything they plan. The past is prologue.

    [–]doginventer 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    I think Kamala is there to make people feel relieved when they swap her out for Tulsi ‘CFR’ Gabbard.